Written by: Samuel K. Sloan (FarPoint Media Exec. News Dir.)

In one of the more idiotic abuses of our tax dollars to come out of Washington is the news that euthanasia is being considered as a method to “deal” with the growing wild horse population in the United States.

A combination of euthanizing the horses and ending roundups are two of the government’s more drastic policies being considered at this time by both the House and the Senate. Those in favor of the proposal state it is the only humane way to adequately cut down the wild hoofers who are beginning to outnumber their range and holding areas.

Hey, here’s first a question and then a thought: Why are the ranges for the wild horses creepingly getting smaller and smaller? How about OVERPOPULATION of the Human Species. I don’t see any legislation on tap to allow euthanasia to curb the out-of-control growth of that overeating, ever expanding herd of 2-leggers we call humanity.

(Read more…)

Written by: Mike McCafferty (FarPoint Media Contributor)

There really is something now called “Earth Hour”, the point of which is to turn off your lights for one hour?

C’mon.

I remember that Earth Day thing. In fact, I did a musical waaay back in college about how we need to safe guard our resources and reduce consumption of…well, everything. We did 4 shows to half filled houses and did a great job of shaming everyone there for a good 90 minutes with song. Nothing like paying $15 to feel really bad about yourself!

And the result? Did we win? Anyone? Crying Indian? Captain Planet? McGruff?

Earth Hour feels like a retrenching by the environmentalists. People have grown weary of the Earth Day thing so it’s been recycled and reduced by 1/24th into something that people actually can accomplish and feel good about instead of the usual hydrogen powered guilt trip we all take on Earth Day. Earth hour is like those perky nutritionists on the ’Today’ show that tell you to order the steamed vegetables instead of the French fires to go with your fired chicken covered with mayo and hot fudge. They smile with their large heads on their tiny bodies and let you know that you’ve saved 300 calories while ignoring the fact that the main course and dessert was 65,000 calories. Turning off your lights is steamed vegetables, but Vegas is still that Chocolate Thunder Cake with double icing (note to self: eat food).

I actually tired the Earth hour thing tonight. Partly out of the distant echoes of self-righteous eco-musical numbers still lodged in my head but mostly because I thought it would be cool to walk around with candles for an hour for a ’Colonial Vibe’. Either way it was a half-assed experience.

For starters, we let Kiernan watch “The Backyardigans” on our 50″ DLP HDTV. I had fantasized about drawing him close and telling him stories around the fireplace like a modern day Daniel Boone or Mark Twain. Ran out of time on that one. Also the idea of letting him watch his show (Which is a pre-bath ritual and as any parent will tell you: don’t screw with the routine!) on a laptop under the misguided logic of at least it’s not drawing from the grid for the next hour, flew out the window. Nope, concession number one was the big bright TV telling tales to my son of anthropomorphic animals who pretended to live in medieval time (true dark ages) and sang non ecologically based songs.

Next, I turned off the computer monitor. Not the computer, mind you. Nor the modem. Or the printer, drawing power while idle. In fact all the DVD players, alarm clocks, TiVos, Phones and microwaves somehow eluded my keen, energy saving eye. Those that did not were saved by one simple thing: I didn’t want to set the time on them again.

Finally, after my son’s non-romantic candle lit bath, we hit our hardest snag. I had just finished my own Knights Tale (we have the episodic story of Tiberius, a knight of strength, virtue and occasional friends like the “Throw-up knight”) with Kiernan and he started to get upset. We leave the hall light on for him and tonight it wasn’t on (routine!). I told him we’d turn it back .. we had saved the Earth, but he was all about the here and now. Fearing a melt-down, we officially canceled the “Battle of Britain” bombing raid exercise and turned on the hall light. All clear, Earth doomed, better luck next year with the Earth Minute.

Later tonight as I settled in with my wife to do our part for HBO Hour, it hit me. Like my son, humanity is really all about the here and now. Because the threat is massive but ambiguous (”in the future, we’ll probably run out of fossil fuels and will eventually cause the Earth to heat by an indeterminate amount should all the current projections stay true”) we can’t grasp it and eventually just forget it. Our threat analysis is flawed and can only address a very provincial scope. We’re also a greedy, lazy self-absorbed animal that in the end will weigh the cost/benefit of helping others that are not in our circle of friends/family as a low priority.

So am I saying we should all just throw up our hands and give up? Doesn’t that mean the terrorists win, Mike (trademarked phrase)? What they hell kind of blog is this?

Here’s pretty much what I’m saying: buy the Prius if it makes you feel better, but that’s about the biggest impact it will have. Should we all try to conserve? Sure, why not. But in the long run, conservation won’t save us, science will have to. That’s where I’ve been going with this rapidly-declining-in-popularity blog.

I’m probably not an environmentalists, but I am a futurist. There is a constant race with science to ultimately fix the problems that science creates. It seems like a dog chasing it’s tail, but if you picture that dog chasing it’s tail up a spiral staircase (that I dub PROGRESS!), the analogy holds together a little better. We’re not smart enough to escape our basic programming of consuming resources until they are gone, but we’re smart enough to find smart people to find other resources.

This is not my Pollyanna future, but rather the darkest before the light scenario. We’ll continue to consume whatever we can, as much as we can until we run out and it starts to kill us. Conservation will slow it down, but ultimately really smart, well fed, well rested scientists are going to have to step in and make stuff that will allow us to keep living by preventing us from killing ourselves. Case in point: Cars kill people, scientists make airbags. Scientists are gonna have to make a big airbag for the Earth, cause we’re going too damn fast.

Will we make it in time? Maybe. Like I said, it’s always a race. In the 60’s People predicted widespread food shortages by the 1980’s. Luckily, some really smart scientists figured out how to crossbreed rice that would grow in various climates and resist insects and blight. Bullet == dodged, and millions of Thai children were able to eat, grow up and make us cheap foam globes with the words “Earth Hour” inscribed on them with lead paint.

There’s also a good chance that our children’s children may have to suffer for a while before we right the ship. I hope not. Maybe Earth Hour does have one true benefit: it can fulfill the old saying of “lighting a candle rather than cursing the darkness”. Maybe there’s hope that if we put our resources into the scientist and then actually LISTEN to them occasionally, their illumination will show us a less bumpy path.

And no matter what our future holds, we can be glad for one thing: that none of you will ever have to see that crappy musical I did. That, friends, was the true darkness.

Written by: Samuel K. Sloan (Farpoint Media Executive News Director)

Just a note to say that in the most recent poll on the site I noticed that one of the most usable, safe and effective energy sources was not listed as a category, so I had to vote ‘Other’. The energy source I speak of is one that has been around now for over 50 years — nuclear energy.

Safe, reliable, clean. In its long history of use no one in the United States has ever died from it, gotten ill from it, the environment hasn’t suffered serious effects from it, not even after the 30 year ago Three Mile Island episode. And, let’s not bother to bring in Chernobyl please. That plant was poorly built in an economically depressed Soviet system, where government controlled cutbacks and shortcuts were the norm. There is no way it can be compared to, for example, U.S. or French made plants. Even current U.S. existing plants are 30 years old and safer than Chernobyl in its prime.

Why we haven’t continued building better and ever safer plants in America baffles me. We have lost an untold number of lives in coal mining accidents and coal is a known dirty pollutant, yet, except for ultra anti-coal extremists, no one is calling for a total ban or end to the mining industry. Wars have been and continue to fought over fossil fuel reserves with hundreds of thousands of young lives being laid waste for the sake of a tank of gas. Some wildlife have gone extinct and others have been placed in grave danger because of our lust for fossil fuels to heat our homes and run our companies. Hybrid electric/gas cars have proven to be a joke when it comes to actual fuel efficiency. The best of them get no more than around 43 miles/gal of gas-equivalent because of the heavy two-engine weight and multiple battery loads. Hell, some of today’s gas-only cars like Toyota, Cooper and Honda boast of coming close to that kind of mileage already. Also, why aren’t pro-Hybrid extremists concerned about all these depleted car batteries from the potential millions of Hybrid cars messing up the environment of our future? Hasn’t anyone even considered that?

Nuclear energy is safe, clean, efficient and cost effective. Storage containers for the waste dispensed by the byproducts have proven to be able to withstand more pressures and hold up under greater stress than they would ever be put through and are guaranteed to remain intact for centuries. The multi-story underground storage facility in Yucca Mountain, Nevada is near completion, virtually water free (dispelling the fear of ground water contamination), and will be ready to store spent fuel and rods by the year 2017 with enough capacity to last for centuries of nuclear waste usage.

If we had concentrated, over the last 30 years, on building just 400 safe nuclear power plants in the U.S. alone, we would already have all the reusable energy this country could ever dream of utilizing for the next 100+ years and drastically cut down on our dependence on foreign and domestic fossil fuels to the point of only needing what was drilled domestically to be used for auto fuel only in high-mileage vehicles; thereby cutting back harmful emissions by nearly two-thirds in less than a decade. Without the over demanding need for fossil fuels we may quite possibly have been able to avert the many conflicts we have been and continue to be engaged in throughout the Middle East. OPEC would no longer be the dominating force it is in the world.

Let’s get real and be honest for a change - wind and solar, while quite probable for the distant future, and an area that should be actively researched and developed now for the long run, is, in the short-term, a pipe dream. Nuclear energy is the ticket for both short-term and long-range energy needs throughout the world.

It is time for saner minds to prevail on this issue — Oh, and for those who use the argument that Nuclear plants are just another target for terrorists, — get a grip — as Penn and Teller are fond of reminding us, in the world we live in everything is a possible target for terrorists, including your workplace, your home, your Capital building; yet no one is asking anyone to stop going to work, no longer build homes and shut down the 50 State Capitals. Why then are we not building better, safer, more efficient nuclear power plants? Extremist-talk on both sides of this issue is, again in Penn and Teller’s own words, “Bulls#%t!” And, quoting Star Trek’s Captain Kirk - “The truth is somewhere in between the two” extremist points of view.

I have no doubt there will be some in the future who will oppose the use of Dilithium Crystals to power our starships.